<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantastic News: U.S. War Deserter Allowed to Stay in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-214013</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-214013</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the response would have been if the deserter had deserted because he/she did not believe Barack Obama was born in the United States?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the response would have been if the deserter had deserted because he/she did not believe Barack Obama was born in the United States?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balbulican</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-214008</link>
		<dc:creator>balbulican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-214008</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s part of the point. The other, I think, is to ensure that an otherwise calm discussion is amped up to levels of rage - which, of course, ensures that we&#039;re not talking calmly about uncomfortable truths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s part of the point. The other, I think, is to ensure that an otherwise calm discussion is amped up to levels of rage &#8211; which, of course, ensures that we&#8217;re not talking calmly about uncomfortable truths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-214007</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-214007</guid>
		<description>balb, 
It&#039;s an anger vent.  The point is not to deliver substance, but to blow off enough steam until the next thing he doesn&#039;t agree comes along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>balb,<br />
It&#8217;s an anger vent.  The point is not to deliver substance, but to blow off enough steam until the next thing he doesn&#8217;t agree comes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balbulican</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213969</link>
		<dc:creator>balbulican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213969</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always an interesting exercise to apply a rhetoric filter to responses like Machiavelli&#039;s - just remove the inflammatory vocabulary to see what actual thought. Surprising often, once you take away the polemic, there&#039;s not much left. Here&#039;s Mac&#039;s, stripped down to its actual substance: 

&quot;,,,,,&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always an interesting exercise to apply a rhetoric filter to responses like Machiavelli&#8217;s &#8211; just remove the inflammatory vocabulary to see what actual thought. Surprising often, once you take away the polemic, there&#8217;s not much left. Here&#8217;s Mac&#8217;s, stripped down to its actual substance: </p>
<p>&#8220;,,,,,&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: machiavelli</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213968</link>
		<dc:creator>machiavelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213968</guid>
		<description>Another example of our left-plunging CINO government appoiting far left-wing whack-job judges to the bench.

Why would any non-moronic judge allow this cowardly piece of terrorist hugging garbage to allow in this country? 

Next these far-left, terrorist sympathizing, often affirmative action bimbo  judges will be inviting Taliban terrorists to come to Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example of our left-plunging CINO government appoiting far left-wing whack-job judges to the bench.</p>
<p>Why would any non-moronic judge allow this cowardly piece of terrorist hugging garbage to allow in this country? </p>
<p>Next these far-left, terrorist sympathizing, often affirmative action bimbo  judges will be inviting Taliban terrorists to come to Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213966</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213966</guid>
		<description>She volunteered for the military,knowing full well how the military felt about gays and lesbians.By the same token the military needs to adhere to the constitution which forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation.Let her prove the discrimination and fear for her life in court.Thats what a lawyer would ask her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She volunteered for the military,knowing full well how the military felt about gays and lesbians.By the same token the military needs to adhere to the constitution which forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation.Let her prove the discrimination and fear for her life in court.Thats what a lawyer would ask her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old white guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213965</link>
		<dc:creator>old white guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213965</guid>
		<description>we all know how to spell stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we all know how to spell stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213964</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213964</guid>
		<description>A lesbian?  Sure! let her stay.  
I do not understand you guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lesbian?  Sure! let her stay.<br />
I do not understand you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213963</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213963</guid>
		<description>I agree with both Aviator and Bob.  She VOLUNTEERED to join the Army and was fully aware of al its policies and the fact she could be deployed anywhere in the world.  She should have brought the whole thing to the attention of her chain of command and sorted it out that way.

She is not a refugees, but a fugitive from justice since she decided to desert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both Aviator and Bob.  She VOLUNTEERED to join the Army and was fully aware of al its policies and the fact she could be deployed anywhere in the world.  She should have brought the whole thing to the attention of her chain of command and sorted it out that way.</p>
<p>She is not a refugees, but a fugitive from justice since she decided to desert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred from BC</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213962</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred from BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213962</guid>
		<description>I disagree with you. A deserter is a criminal under military law, so this person is a fugitive from justice, not a legitimate refugee. She should be extradited, not given refuge.

---------------------
  
  And she will be (extradited). Can you imagine the American reaction if we started granting military deserters Canadian citizenship? The people who think this is a good idea are in deep denial; that South African guy we rejected recently as a &#039;refugee&#039; claimant had a better case than this woman does...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with you. A deserter is a criminal under military law, so this person is a fugitive from justice, not a legitimate refugee. She should be extradited, not given refuge.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>  And she will be (extradited). Can you imagine the American reaction if we started granting military deserters Canadian citizenship? The people who think this is a good idea are in deep denial; that South African guy we rejected recently as a &#8216;refugee&#8217; claimant had a better case than this woman does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213961</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213961</guid>
		<description>&#039;fraid I gotta agree with Aviator.  Lesbian or not she enlisted knowing full well she could be deployed at some point.   She should be extradited immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;fraid I gotta agree with Aviator.  Lesbian or not she enlisted knowing full well she could be deployed at some point.   She should be extradited immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviator</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213960</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213960</guid>
		<description>I disagree with you.  A deserter is a criminal under military law, so this person is a fugitive from justice, not a legitimate refugee.  She should be extradited, not given refuge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with you.  A deserter is a criminal under military law, so this person is a fugitive from justice, not a legitimate refugee.  She should be extradited, not given refuge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savant</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/11/20/fantastic-news-u-s-war-deserter-allowed-to-stay-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-213959</link>
		<dc:creator>Savant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6848#comment-213959</guid>
		<description>The problem with all this is that the proper forum for Pte. Bethany Smith is in the U.S. legal system.  Granting refugee status to ANYONE from the United States makes a mockey of our immigration system.  

Can you imagine if the U.S. granted refugee status to Canadians on the basis that they felt they would be &#039;percecuted&#039; in Canada? If anything the legal system in the U.S. better protects its citizens than in Canada.  What&#039;s more Obama is in the process of doing away with DADT, which makes this entire arguement moot.  

A refugee is a person who has a well-founded fear of being persecuted based on their beliefs, and their country will not protect them.  The United States will protect its citizens from such persecution, which means this refugee claim will fail.  The day we start approving refugee claims from the United States is the day we close the border.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with all this is that the proper forum for Pte. Bethany Smith is in the U.S. legal system.  Granting refugee status to ANYONE from the United States makes a mockey of our immigration system.  </p>
<p>Can you imagine if the U.S. granted refugee status to Canadians on the basis that they felt they would be &#8216;percecuted&#8217; in Canada? If anything the legal system in the U.S. better protects its citizens than in Canada.  What&#8217;s more Obama is in the process of doing away with DADT, which makes this entire arguement moot.  </p>
<p>A refugee is a person who has a well-founded fear of being persecuted based on their beliefs, and their country will not protect them.  The United States will protect its citizens from such persecution, which means this refugee claim will fail.  The day we start approving refugee claims from the United States is the day we close the border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

