<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veering Off Course, or, A Long Rambling Post on Human Rights Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/09/02/veering-off-course-or-a-long-rambling-post-on-human-rights-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/09/02/veering-off-course-or-a-long-rambling-post-on-human-rights-evolution/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Calder</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2009/09/02/veering-off-course-or-a-long-rambling-post-on-human-rights-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-213221</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Calder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=6149#comment-213221</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, thank you for this. It clarifies much of what I was thinking when I started my rant in that last post of mine. This is very much more toward what I was thinking. As I said, it was late, I was foggy and a little annoyed by a personal experience. Probably not the best circumstances under which to post an opinion. ;)

Anyway, aside from some of the Human Rights that are recorded in that UN document, I think that it fairly well sums it up. That being said, I disagree totally with adding &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; &quot;Rights&quot; to that document. Rather, I could possibly agree to reviewing what those existing &quot;Rights&quot; encompass aka definitions/clarifications or as you said, the application and understanding of those elemental Rights. I understand that I wasn&#039;t very clear in that when I spoke about the evolution of Human Rights.

Thank-you also for including that statement that indicates the differences between Human Rights and Legal Rights, although I hesitate to consider them &quot;Legal Rights&quot; rather than Legal Entitlements. Throwing in the word Rights just complicates the issue as far as I&#039;m concerned.

This is a far better launchpad for the discussion than I had.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, thank you for this. It clarifies much of what I was thinking when I started my rant in that last post of mine. This is very much more toward what I was thinking. As I said, it was late, I was foggy and a little annoyed by a personal experience. Probably not the best circumstances under which to post an opinion. ;)</p>
<p>Anyway, aside from some of the Human Rights that are recorded in that UN document, I think that it fairly well sums it up. That being said, I disagree totally with adding <em>new</em> &#8220;Rights&#8221; to that document. Rather, I could possibly agree to reviewing what those existing &#8220;Rights&#8221; encompass aka definitions/clarifications or as you said, the application and understanding of those elemental Rights. I understand that I wasn&#8217;t very clear in that when I spoke about the evolution of Human Rights.</p>
<p>Thank-you also for including that statement that indicates the differences between Human Rights and Legal Rights, although I hesitate to consider them &#8220;Legal Rights&#8221; rather than Legal Entitlements. Throwing in the word Rights just complicates the issue as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p>This is a far better launchpad for the discussion than I had.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

