Michael Ignatieff: Recent History Repeating

June 18, 2009 · By

Those who don’t not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

I find it somewhat amusing that such a lauded academic, as Michael Ignatieff claims himself to be, somehow missed that little nugget of historical truth. I find it especially interesting since he actually lived on the front lines of this ‘recent history’ for the entirety of it’s course. Maybe he wasn’t paying attention as he quietly concentrated on sharpening his dagger….

Still, Michael Ignatieff is now experiencing Stephane Dion: Re-deux. It must be incredibly frustrating for him to suddenly find himself in that position when he obviously expected thngs to be different simply because he ‘wasn’t Stephane Dion’.

Evidently Mr. Ignatieff, you are.

Obviously Mr. Ignatieff needs to spend a little more time here in Canada learning the moods of the public at large before he starts trying to throw his weight around. Canadians are sick of elections!

One, to think that he might be able to get away with yet another within a year of the last, with a public that was already exhausted before the last one, is absurd. Two, to try and use EI as the ostensible excuse when even a cursory glance at public opinion showed that EI issues aren’t even a luke-warm topic worthy of fighting an election over. Three, backlash against those who decide not to work in order to pressure others into giving them what they want has been astonishing.

What’s even more amazing though, is that Mr. Ignatieff doesn’t see it. We can all rest assured that the BLOC and the NDP will take great pleasure in letting him know over the course of the summer.

Undoubtedly, people are starting to wake up to the fact that the Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) has yet to provide anything even remotely resembling a coherent position or ability to take over the governance of the nation. To date, all they’ve done is dribble out limp ideas or material that has an extremely short shelf life more suited to an election than political grandstanding.

I believe also, that this recent trip to the precipice (brought to you by your neighbourhood LPC) is forcing Canadians to actually examine what it is that the LPC is offering. What are their policies? Where do they stand on position “X”? What is their vision for the country? These are all things that the LPC is going to be busy defending over the summer, and likely in an unsatisfactory way.

Are they afraid of the Conservatives taking some of those ideas and running with them? Is that why Dion waffled so often? And what’s wrong with that anyway if it’s for the good of the country?

Here’s a newsflash for you Mr. Ignatieff. The role of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition is……..

The duty of the Official Opposition and other opposition parties is to “challenge” government policies and suggest improvements, and present an alternative to the current Government’s policy agenda.

And “challenge” is not the same thing as “oppose“.

Now, can you actually imagine how well Canada would be served if ALL parties who stood in opposition actually did that every time they complained about something? Admittedly, all parties are guilty of not doing their full jobs here, but if they actually focused on doing what’s best for the country, and PROVING that they are in fact a Government in waiting…..well, I’m sure you see where that goes.

Until then, it appears that Mighty Michael Ignatieff is content to follow the weak example of his recent predecessors.

________________________________________________________

Update: June 18, 2009 @ 3:21pm EST

And in case any of us had forgotten

Comments

7 Responses to “Michael Ignatieff: Recent History Repeating”

  1. Nicola Timmerman on June 18th, 2009 12:27 pm [#]

    I’m still waiting for a good picture of PM Harper to appear on the front or second page of the National Post or the Globe and Mail. Everytime I see a pic of Ignatieff he is smiling, looking wise or looking up at the sky. PM Harper is always portrayed as sullen, unjoyful and often at a distance.

  2. wilson on June 18th, 2009 12:46 pm [#]

    Hadn’t noticed that Nicola, but so true.

    After this last week of drama, I am soooo not wanting an in-your-face politician ‘messing with me’ !!!

  3. SilverNails on June 18th, 2009 6:58 pm [#]

    Has anyone else been receiving the leaflets in the mail from the Libs? You know, the same type that they lambasted the Conservatives for mailing out? Notice whose photo is in the spot where postage normally goes? Yes, that’s right. Lester B. Guess the Liberals had to go THAT far back in history to find a decent lib!

    Good piece Sean! Right on! Iggy Eyebrow is just Stephane Dion in a more expensive suit.

  4. Dogears on June 18th, 2009 7:46 pm [#]

    Harper’s lawsuit paying off… and so both leading parties may both have bent the rules in past elections. Is there a suggestion that Harper may have intimidated Elections Canada. That would be a dangerous suggestion given some opinions of his nature.

  5. Werner Patels on June 18th, 2009 9:17 pm [#]

    I’m glad to see we’re not going to blow $300 million on an election forced down our throats by the Liberals. But if I were a Liberal, I’d really start thinking seriously about the leadership qualities of my Dear Leader …

  6. Blame Crash on June 18th, 2009 9:21 pm [#]

    Members of the “smart set” like the aforementioned “lauded quackademic” are grossly over rated, just like all the so called “experts”.

  7. Sean Calder on June 19th, 2009 8:04 am [#]

    You’re right Werner, they really should. The groundwork has already been laid for another Stephane Dion summer, and it appears they’re still playing by the same rulebook that Stephane Dion did.

    ‘The government must do 4 things in order for us to support…’

    ‘Stephen Harper agrees to something he already planned to do…’

    ‘In the best interests of Canadians, we’re going to support…’

    ‘I will say when it’s time for an election…’

    Do any of those comments sound familiar? Did we not hear those very same words not too long ago and again just recently?

    This very clearly (at least to me) looks like a serious case of ‘New Leader same as the Old Leader’. The Liberals should be worried about their ‘anointed’ one and maybe actually have some kind of serious Leadership process installed so these things don’t happen.

    Of course, Conservatives are leaning back and smiling while admiring the “I told you so’s” on the tips of each others tongues.

Got something to say? (Read the rules first)