This is more embarrassing than waking up to an NDP sign on your lawn. And I’m sure that Harper’s team have the Liberal stories all ready to spill once that confidence motion comes on May 5!
Oh, and just regarding the actual laws surrounding this whole issue, Andrew had it covered last week.
dalton wrote:
Hi, Matthew. Sorry to intrude on this thread, but you indicated below that I had “been the one selectively choosing when to debate in the past year.” I just wanted to assure you that that’s an error: I am VERY interested in debate, and I’d like to point out that there are now two questions waiting for your response in the threads below: there’s a questions about your statistics in the “Expelled Opening Weekend” thread, and a question about “proof” in the “Canada’s Biggest Mistake” thread.
Looking forward to your responses. Thanks so much.
Posted on 30-Apr-08 at 4:16 am | Permalink
Kelseigh wrote:
Perhaps a preview button would facilitate debate? Could you get on that, Matt, that’s a dear.
Posted on 30-Apr-08 at 6:53 am | Permalink
Grog wrote:
Saying that “they did it too” doesn’t excuse the utter dishonesty of the scheme in the first place.
Especially when it is perpetrated by a party that ran on a campaign platform of “Open, Honest and Accountable” government!
Posted on 30-Apr-08 at 9:37 am | Permalink
Scott from Winnipeg wrote:
There is a growing - and convincing - body of evidence to suggest that Matthew is a fan of virtual self-flagellation.
Is it possible for credibility to be numerically expressed as something less than zero?
Posted on 30-Apr-08 at 5:46 pm | Permalink
qwerty wrote:
This will once again be very embarrassing for the Liberals. I have raised this point many, many times. They are bankrupt, finacially and morally. We knew this since the last election of 2006.
Where are all the gay rights groups and poverty groups surely they can fundraise for the Liberals. All that Liberal pandering to the special intrests has to be good for something right?
Posted on 01-May-08 at 3:03 pm | Permalink