<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Financing: &#8220;Uh-oh&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: qwerty</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/#comment-181174</link>
		<dc:creator>qwerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=3261#comment-181174</guid>
		<description>This will once again be very embarrassing for the Liberals.  I have raised this point many, many times.  They are bankrupt, finacially and morally.  We knew this since the last election of 2006.
Where are all the gay rights groups and poverty groups surely they can fundraise for the Liberals.  All that Liberal pandering to the special intrests has to be good for something right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will once again be very embarrassing for the Liberals.  I have raised this point many, many times.  They are bankrupt, finacially and morally.  We knew this since the last election of 2006.<br />
Where are all the gay rights groups and poverty groups surely they can fundraise for the Liberals.  All that Liberal pandering to the special intrests has to be good for something right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Winnipeg</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/#comment-181141</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Winnipeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=3261#comment-181141</guid>
		<description>There is a growing - and convincing - body of evidence to suggest that Matthew is a fan of virtual self-flagellation.

Is it possible for credibility to be numerically expressed as something less than zero?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a growing - and convincing - body of evidence to suggest that Matthew is a fan of virtual self-flagellation.</p>
<p>Is it possible for credibility to be numerically expressed as something less than zero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grog</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/#comment-181138</link>
		<dc:creator>Grog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=3261#comment-181138</guid>
		<description>Saying that "they did it too" doesn't excuse the utter dishonesty of the scheme in the first place.

Especially when it is perpetrated by a party that ran on a campaign platform of "Open, Honest and Accountable" government!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that &#8220;they did it too&#8221; doesn&#8217;t excuse the utter dishonesty of the scheme in the first place.</p>
<p>Especially when it is perpetrated by a party that ran on a campaign platform of &#8220;Open, Honest and Accountable&#8221; government!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelseigh</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/#comment-181135</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelseigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=3261#comment-181135</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a preview button would facilitate debate?  Could you get on that, Matt, that's a dear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a preview button would facilitate debate?  Could you get on that, Matt, that&#8217;s a dear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/29/election-financing-uh-oh/#comment-181134</link>
		<dc:creator>dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/?p=3261#comment-181134</guid>
		<description>Hi, Matthew. Sorry to intrude on this thread, but you indicated below that I had “been the one selectively choosing when to debate in the past year.” I just wanted to assure you that that's an error: I am VERY interested in debate, and I’d like to point out that there are now two questions waiting for your response in the threads below: there’s a questions about your statistics in the “Expelled Opening Weekend” thread, and a question about “proof” in the “Canada’s Biggest Mistake” thread.

Looking forward to your responses. Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Matthew. Sorry to intrude on this thread, but you indicated below that I had “been the one selectively choosing when to debate in the past year.” I just wanted to assure you that that&#8217;s an error: I am VERY interested in debate, and I’d like to point out that there are now two questions waiting for your response in the threads below: there’s a questions about your statistics in the “Expelled Opening Weekend” thread, and a question about “proof” in the “Canada’s Biggest Mistake” thread.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your responses. Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
