Did the TTC Just Kill It’s Sweet Public-Private Partnership Deal?

Amazing, just sheerly amazing! That’s the only thing that can be said about the TTC union’s decision to reject a deal so sweet that the last week was littered with dozens of columns expressing the devastating effects of allowing TTC employees a golden goose as big as being guaranteed highest bidder for not just any contract in Toronto, but in the GTA. First Toronto, tomorrow the world?…

While the reasons for the union, essentially a private organization unaccountable to voters, to reject such a honey of deal remains unclear at this time, it might be time to eulogize this sort of hostage-victim relationship that the transit workers have enjoyed with the city over the last few decades since it’ll never be sweeter than this again. Combined with an illegal strike in 2006, today’s sudden cancellation of service will likely mark a turn in already sour public temperament after the aforementioned week of learning from the media just how much they had to empty the cupboard this time to appease the already well-compensated workers. As a general rule, you don’t come back to the kid you just stole lunch money again for another sucker punch indulgence. That’s exactly what the TTC has done here, prompting both Comrade Miller and a formerly reluctant Dalton McGuinty to reach a deal legislating back-to-work orders, on top of considering a further provision making the TTC essential service. If that last part is successful (and it should be since paying our taxes to public unions is also an essential service), the TTC will have lost most of the ridiculous bargaining powers it used to hold the 2 million-plus city at bay. The threats of literally shutting down the city will evaporate over night and Toronto might actually be able to keep new contract raises under the rate of inflation.

If, on the other hand, the TTC fights back and takes a page from the teachers unions’ during the Bill Davis years in the 1970s, we’ll enter into an ugly, painful, but necessary stage where the public’s outrage with an out of control union will flare up so quickly that we might actually begin to see private transportation grow to a significant level of business. Fleets of shuttle cars, taxis and other creative means of moving people would remove any necessity for the TTC, which would be relegated to a poor cousin dependent on government honey for survival, and much akin to the CBC today. We might see a Mike Harris-type Premier come along and ask why the TTC’s subway service just couldn’t be privatized like the 407 was nine years ago, since commuters already pay for the TTC as it is.

In short, the TTC is about to be de-clawed, and if it shows any teeth because of the procedure, it might find itself further surgically altered. The TTC’s literally putting all it’s stakes on the line today though. Enjoy the nice Saturday weather and smugness today though, for tomorrow you find out that you’ll get more than you bargained for!

UPDATE: Views from Joanne and Tony, with more to follow I’m sure!




Comments (2) to “Did the TTC Just Kill It’s Sweet Public-Private Partnership Deal?”

  1. Hi, Matthew. Sorry to bother you. But you indicated below that I had “been the one selectively choosing when to debate the past year.” I assure you I am VERY interested in debate, and I’d like to point out that there are now two questions waiting for your response in the threads below: there’s a questions about your statistics in the “Expelled Opening Weekend” thread, and a question about “proof” in the “Canada’s Biggest Mistake” thread.

    Looking forward to your responses.

  2. It’s worth noting that once the TTC is deemed to be an essential service (if that happens) they’ll probably end up getting BETTER contracts in the future, not worse. That’s because arbitrated contracts almost always favour the workers (in part because arbitrators are sympathetic to the fact that the workers have no recourse against their employers). Rarely do negotiations that end up in arbitration favour the employer, and as an essential service, any time there couldn’t be a negotiated agreement (which would be EVERY time) it would go to arbitration.

    Not that this is an argument against declaring the TTC an essential service. I’d frankly rather pay to keep this type of disruption from ever happening again, but people should realize that declaring the TTC essential won’t make their next contract less generous.

    It could even make the next contract BETTER for the union.

Post a Comment
(Never published)