Can we destroy any incentives that may lead to this corruption from happening again? or any other corruption that is happening right now? I wonder.
Sometimes we can be suckers for punishment to the point where we are blind to the bigger picture of corruption in public office or the civil service. I do not care whether Paul Champagne goes to jail or not. I just want my money back!
Even if we can not get all of the money back, I would say that realistically, firing him is probably sufficient punishment given that he is going bankrupt. Try applying for a job with “I swindled the tax-payer.” written on your forehead and unexplained blank time periods on your resume.
By the way, I think a few people in the Department of National Defense should be fired too.
“All Canadians were victims of these offences and all no doubt felt a sense of betrayal and loss because of them,” said Justice Ann Alder who sentenced him to seven years in jail. Sorry, not good enough. In fact, I think the judge’s statement is highly naive because not all Canadians were victims at all. [Maybe being naive is the best thing we can do? The justice system is part of the civil service too.] Some clearly benefited by being his clients. We should never forget the middlemen.
Hewlett-Packard reached an out-of-court settlement with Champagne before he was convicted of fraud. If you read the rest of the article, you find a lot of tax-payer’s money was spent by Champagne in many different extravagant ways. As it turns out, many assets “owned” by Champagne but paid by the tax-payer are now going to Hewlett-Packard! Great!
Unless you grow your own vegetables, raise your own livestock, chop your own wood, fetch your own water and weave your own wool, there will always be a middleman. I am not saying that all middleman are complicit and I do not want to cast aspersions on Hewlett-Packard. My hope is to point out that how we deal with corruption should be more profound than putting one guy on a chopping block. Bureaucracy can be a nasty network.

C wrote:
“As it turns out, many assets “owned” by Champagne but paid by the tax-payer are now going to Hewlett-Packard! Great!”
From the article you asked us to read the rest of:
“From the government’s perspective, this is not a case of unrecovered money. HP cut the government of cheque of $146 million in 2004, making good the entire amount that was stolen from DND.”
Now admittedly, i’m not 100% sure what “of cheque of” is meant to mean (a cheque of?), but it reads to me like HP have paid back the money that was stolen. Please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted on 09-Apr-08 at 1:37 pm | Permalink
Charles Anthony wrote:
This is all just speculation but HP either did $146 million worth of work or not. Cutting a cheque to the government could have just been a settlement to avoid opening up their books publicly.
Posted on 09-Apr-08 at 2:46 pm | Permalink