<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Achtung! Thank you for smoking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abattoir</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177487</link>
		<dc:creator>Abattoir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177487</guid>
		<description>Marsilio, are you suggesting a conclusion based solely on the origin of the tobacco ban, rather than its current meaning or context?

Rather ironic, considering your last post provided the definition of the term 'genetic fallacy' for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marsilio, are you suggesting a conclusion based solely on the origin of the tobacco ban, rather than its current meaning or context?</p>
<p>Rather ironic, considering your last post provided the definition of the term &#8216;genetic fallacy&#8217; for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaqchikel</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177481</link>
		<dc:creator>kaqchikel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177481</guid>
		<description>The imaginary world that George Orwell created in his _1984_ has become synonymous with oppression and totalitarianism. But even in Oceania people could smoke! They had crappy tobacco, but they were allowed to possess, transport, smoke and even offer tobacco to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The imaginary world that George Orwell created in his _1984_ has become synonymous with oppression and totalitarianism. But even in Oceania people could smoke! They had crappy tobacco, but they were allowed to possess, transport, smoke and even offer tobacco to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177470</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177470</guid>
		<description>In 1915, the first state anti-marijuana law was passed in Utah.


Marsilio,  
You are completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1915, the first state anti-marijuana law was passed in Utah.</p>
<p>Marsilio,<br />
You are completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177462</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/01/31/achtung-thank-you-for-smoking/#comment-177462</guid>
		<description>Hey you should have the right to smoke until your lungs explode... but you DON'T have the right to pollute the air I'M breathing.  Why should your right to kill yourself supersede my right to breath clean, smoke-free air?  Guess what?  It DOESN'T.  So you can make all the retarded connections to nazism you want but the fact remains that non-smokers' rights to NOT smoke take precedent.  You wanna smoke?  Go ahead!  Just do it where YOU are the only one you're harming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you should have the right to smoke until your lungs explode&#8230; but you DON&#8217;T have the right to pollute the air I&#8217;M breathing.  Why should your right to kill yourself supersede my right to breath clean, smoke-free air?  Guess what?  It DOESN&#8217;T.  So you can make all the retarded connections to nazism you want but the fact remains that non-smokers&#8217; rights to NOT smoke take precedent.  You wanna smoke?  Go ahead!  Just do it where YOU are the only one you&#8217;re harming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
