Evangelicals for Mitt
December 20, 2007 · By Aaron Unruh
Yes, it is indeed a funny name for any kind of group. Perhaps “Evangelicals in Defense of Mormonism”? But the mission statement should at least provoke some thought for American Evangelicals:
The 2008 election is for president, not pastor…
Political and moral values are informed by — but not the same as — one’s religion…For example, in 1980 voters had two choices: a divorced movie actor who did not regularly attend church and was not on good terms with all of his children, and a once-married Southern Baptist whose evangelicalism was at the core of his national identity. Voting on the basis of whose doctrine was better would have meant electing the second guy — Jimmy Carter — over the first, Ronald Reagan.


Actually it wasn’t all that long ago that you would have been derided for your view on this subject. But then liberals came along and well we know what happened next. (real conservative)