Richard Warman v. Jessica Beaumont

November 23, 2007 · By Aaron Unruh

Doesn’t that kind of remind you of the rocket club nerd reporting the faux rebellious goth smoker to the principal?

Yes, the CHRC ruled that citing a verse from the Old Testament condemning homosexuality constituted hate speech. Yes, that is mildly annoying. No, it’s not surprising. No, I will not enter into mind-numbing discussions over context and blah blah blah (Believe me, I excuse myself from more than enough such discussions amongst “experts” in real life). And no, I will not get excited about the decisions of this dustbin collection of fringy buffoons, “empowered” nerds, and their legal profession enablers whose entire substantive impact in the real world has been zippo.

I mean, really. Jessica Beaumont? Who is next on Warman’s shit list? I’ll bet there’s lots and lots more unemployed teenage girls out there that the CHRC could totally make an example out of. And more neo-nazis. After all, these people are too stupid to even make a living or hold their marriages together. Clearly they and their unemployed teenaged electro-propagandists constitute an immense danger to our well-being and must be crushed by our saviors in the CHRC!

Want to gain lifetime immunity from the wrath of the CHRC and its Jerry Springer jihad? Then make some money. Or marry someone with money. Hell, even Malcolm Ross has been able to elude human rights authorities for the entirety of his genuinely anti-semitic book writing career merely by the fact that he has never lost his salary as a teacher.

Or better yet, go get a law degree. Richard Warman will run screaming from you.

Comments

7 Responses to “Richard Warman v. Jessica Beaumont”

  1. Dr.Dawg on November 23rd, 2007 3:04 pm [#]

    Well, Aaron, as you know if you’ve read the judgment, this is about one-thirtieth of the story.

    But I find all this sympathy on the Right for a neo-Nazi…touching.

  2. Real Conservative on November 23rd, 2007 3:14 pm [#]

    Quite interesting since it has been many Christians that fought for human rights. But the commies, haters, and freaks only see what they want to see, a good deal of which is lies anyways.

  3. Aaron Unruh on November 23rd, 2007 3:45 pm [#]

    “But I find all this sympathy on the Right for a neo-Nazi…touching.”

    You must have mistaken my contempt for sympathy. It’s understandable. When I call people “stupid,” I’m actually expressing my undying sympathy for them, you sympathetic guy you.

  4. Belle Geste on November 23rd, 2007 4:15 pm [#]

    Now it’s Richard Warman v Free Dominion & the FD Eight

    Ask not for whom the bell tolls.

  5. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Canadians allowed the same amount of free speech that Chinese get. on November 29th, 2007 8:29 pm [#]

    [...] Dead Animals, The London Fog, For Life And Family, Dust My Broom, Big Blue Wave, bcrevolution, The Politic, Cyber Class, Canadian Free Speech, digital-copyright, No Apologies, rabble almost worried. [...]

  6. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Mark steyn drawn to the Thought Police just in time for human rights day. on December 10th, 2007 10:49 am [#]

    [...] OMMAG, The London Fog, For Life And Family, Dust My Broom, Big Blue Wave, bcrevolution, The Politic, Cyber Class, Canadian Free Speech, digital-copyright, No Apologies, rabble almost worried. [...]

  7. Marginalized Action Dinosaur » Lame charges vs Mark Steyn. on December 14th, 2007 7:01 pm [#]

    [...] OMMAG, The London Fog, For Life And Family, Dust My Broom, Big Blue Wave, bcrevolution, The Politic, Cyber Class, Canadian Free Speech, digital-copyright, No Apologies, rabble almost worried. [...]

Got something to say?