Shocker: 21-year old gets drunk…

November 4, 2007 · By Aaron Unruh

…takes naked pictures of himself and *gasp* downloads porn off the internet!

But he’s a right-winger, so cue the “hate the sinner” moralistic left.

Or, we could just calm down:

The kid is 21. Cut him a little slack. Heck, I do shit like that, and I’m a decade older than him!

Still, one can’t help but laugh:

Quah, nicknamed “Australia’s Smallest Loser” in a parody of a popular television series after the photos came to light…

Comments

10 Responses to “Shocker: 21-year old gets drunk…”

  1. E in Md on November 5th, 2007 8:53 am [#]

    Ah I see. So porn is only immoral when liberals do it. When a right winger does it he’s ‘just a kid, cut him some slack.’

    Ok, I got it. Just wanted to make sure the rule of ‘Its ok when we do it’ was still in place.

  2. anon on November 5th, 2007 9:32 am [#]

    EinMd:

    No joke.

  3. mahmood on November 5th, 2007 1:59 pm [#]

    “Sy the way, does anyone know where Wendy Sullivan uploaded her nekkid pics?”

    yeh I do, they’re right beside your momma’s nekkid pics and just behind your grandma’s nekkid pics…by the way tell your ma to check her dna, her butt looks nothing like grandma’s but her face does…something not right there.

  4. Grog on November 5th, 2007 4:00 pm [#]

    Lessee, the twerp’s running as a candidate for a “family values” party (one of the usual crowd who whine and snivel about all things “unchristian”), and gets caught out?

    Sorry Aaron – no sympathy here for double standards. Live by the sword, die by the sword – pretty simple if you ask me.

  5. Aaron Unruh on November 5th, 2007 8:46 pm [#]

    Grog sez: “Lessee, the twerp’s running as a candidate for a “family values” party (one of the usual crowd who whine and snivel about all things “unchristian”), and gets caught out?”

    So you think there’s something wrong with sending pictures of yourself out over the internet? Just wondering, but if you think so, you should say so. Or does this new morality only apply to “family values” people?

  6. Aaron Unruh on November 5th, 2007 8:57 pm [#]

    E in Md: “Ah I see. So porn is only immoral when liberals do it. When a right winger does it he’s ‘just a kid, cut him some slack.’”

    Fascinating interpretation of my post, moron. Perhaps you should have a sit down with “Grog” here. He appears to think that porn is only immoral if you happen to be a “family values” guy. If you’re an enlightened non family values guy, then download away.

    Really, I could care less who looks at nekkid women. Porn for the masses! But it is surprising that you live-and-let-live leftists are constantly obsessed with what people look at on their computers, what they do in bathroom stalls, etc. etc.. I would make some psychoanalytic comment here about all of you and your mothers (who appears to be at the forefront of “Right Wing Letch”’s mind – oh to be a commentless site), but, really, that’s for losers on the left to do (and they do, constantly).

  7. Scott from Winnipeg on November 5th, 2007 10:10 pm [#]

    What is irony’s equivalent to “sarchasm”?

    At the bottom of that yet-named void, we shall find the broken body of Mr. Unruh.

    Somebody call a waaaaambulance!

  8. Charles Anthony on November 6th, 2007 5:22 am [#]

    Lefties and Righties… hmmm… this really is getting tiresome….
    Some people just love to read too much into things.

    I am going to let you, Aaron Unruh, in on a little secret: newspapers are out to make a buck.

    Unfortunately for the newspaper industry, fewer and fewer people are actually buying newspapers. Therefore, whatever can make the headlines is fair-game and politics has very VERY little to do with the motivation of the publishers.

  9. Grog on November 6th, 2007 8:00 am [#]

    Sez Aaron:

    So you think there’s something wrong with sending pictures of yourself out over the internet?

    What I do is irrelevant – I’m not the one standing on a soapbox decrying internet porn and then making my own flavor of it.

    What part of “hypocrite” don’t you get here?

  10. Anonymous on November 6th, 2007 8:17 am [#]

    Come on guys, Aaron is an idiot, we all know it. Why do we give him the opportunity to have an audience. If we left him alone, maybe he would find that rock he crawled out from underneith a few years back, and then the internet would be a much more interesting place.

Got something to say? (Read the rules first)