<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Vote Against Legal Apartheid in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/09/24/a-vote-against-legal-apartheid-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/09/24/a-vote-against-legal-apartheid-in-canada/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/09/24/a-vote-against-legal-apartheid-in-canada/#comment-168737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/09/24/a-vote-against-legal-apartheid-in-canada/#comment-168737</guid>
		<description>Stiffer fines for trespassing? Right . . . good idea John. Why such a proposal warrants one "enormous glaring check in the pro-Tory category" is not at all clear, unless you like toothless tiger proposals - which this proposal most certainly is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stiffer fines for trespassing? Right . . . good idea John. Why such a proposal warrants one &#8220;enormous glaring check in the pro-Tory category&#8221; is not at all clear, unless you like toothless tiger proposals - which this proposal most certainly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
