<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Pride: All About Liberation (except for those poor, sick or ugly people)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/#comment-166370</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/#comment-166370</guid>
		<description>Oh, wait, those were my comments on an actual newsworthy topic!

As opposed to your post, in which you somehow turned a story about gay community members concerned about corporations monetary involvement in gay pride celebrations into some type of slam.

You should figure out what your obsession about gays is all about, as you seem to forsake all other stories for cheap potshots at them at every opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wait, those were my comments on an actual newsworthy topic!</p>
<p>As opposed to your post, in which you somehow turned a story about gay community members concerned about corporations monetary involvement in gay pride celebrations into some type of slam.</p>
<p>You should figure out what your obsession about gays is all about, as you seem to forsake all other stories for cheap potshots at them at every opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/#comment-166369</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/08/07/gay-pride-all-about-liberation-except-for-those-poor-sick-or-ugly-people/#comment-166369</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your post, Mike.

I have often wondered why Bush doesn't get more "credit" for the direction Iran has taken.  He marginalized the moderate forces and, lo and behold, the hardliners took over.  Who could possibly have foreseen that?

Then again that's probably what Cheney wanted since it is much harder to take steps towards war with a moderately elected government.  So by some bizarre neocon interpretation they got what they wanted, didn't they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post, Mike.</p>
<p>I have often wondered why Bush doesn&#8217;t get more &#8220;credit&#8221; for the direction Iran has taken.  He marginalized the moderate forces and, lo and behold, the hardliners took over.  Who could possibly have foreseen that?</p>
<p>Then again that&#8217;s probably what Cheney wanted since it is much harder to take steps towards war with a moderately elected government.  So by some bizarre neocon interpretation they got what they wanted, didn&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
