<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Bronco buck conventional wisdom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaunque</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaunque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163116</guid>
		<description>Unless there is some serious vote spliting on the right, which judging by the current status of the right of PC parties isn't very likely, I don't think the PC's as currently constituted are in danger of losing any upcoming election.

They would have to suffer a complete collapse in Calgary during the next election, and despite the recent by-election, I doubt that will happen. There are some strong PC candidates who will retain their seats, despite Stelmach's bumbling, and outside of Calgary and Edmonton, the Liberals (and NDP) will have no currency whatsoever.

I guess we will know the answer in the run up to municipal elections in October. If Bronco throws his hat in for another term, that probably means he isn't interested in the Liberal job. He would have to make his interest known now, in hopes that Taft will fall on the sword, and step aside for him to establish himself before the next election.

If the Lib's have a strong showing provincially with Taft as leader, he won't be going anywhere for one more term.

In the meantime, if the Tories fall apart, then the search for a new leader will be on, and Bronco will be perfectly placed to step in and save the PC Party.

Like I said before, Stelmach's supporters will likely back the leader whoever it is, as will much of rural Alberta, as long as they're PC and there's no challenger on the right. Morton's camp doesn't factor into the equation, as the potential supporters of Bronconnier would also have been Dinning supporters, and they made their feelings known on Morton's place in the party during the leadership campiagn.

Granted, if Bronco won, I'm sure Morton and his camp would vacate the premesis, which could threaten the PC's future prospects. However Bronco would likely reposition the party as Alberta's "Progressive" Conservative party, and ultimately the losers in this situation would be the Liberals. We'd have a realignment of the party system in Alberta, which is ultimately a good thing, because then we'd have at least one viable true conservative party in the province, as opposed to the absence of one right now.

I hear you guys, but if Bronco didn't end up as PC leader, I'd be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless there is some serious vote spliting on the right, which judging by the current status of the right of PC parties isn&#8217;t very likely, I don&#8217;t think the PC&#8217;s as currently constituted are in danger of losing any upcoming election.</p>
<p>They would have to suffer a complete collapse in Calgary during the next election, and despite the recent by-election, I doubt that will happen. There are some strong PC candidates who will retain their seats, despite Stelmach&#8217;s bumbling, and outside of Calgary and Edmonton, the Liberals (and NDP) will have no currency whatsoever.</p>
<p>I guess we will know the answer in the run up to municipal elections in October. If Bronco throws his hat in for another term, that probably means he isn&#8217;t interested in the Liberal job. He would have to make his interest known now, in hopes that Taft will fall on the sword, and step aside for him to establish himself before the next election.</p>
<p>If the Lib&#8217;s have a strong showing provincially with Taft as leader, he won&#8217;t be going anywhere for one more term.</p>
<p>In the meantime, if the Tories fall apart, then the search for a new leader will be on, and Bronco will be perfectly placed to step in and save the PC Party.</p>
<p>Like I said before, Stelmach&#8217;s supporters will likely back the leader whoever it is, as will much of rural Alberta, as long as they&#8217;re PC and there&#8217;s no challenger on the right. Morton&#8217;s camp doesn&#8217;t factor into the equation, as the potential supporters of Bronconnier would also have been Dinning supporters, and they made their feelings known on Morton&#8217;s place in the party during the leadership campiagn.</p>
<p>Granted, if Bronco won, I&#8217;m sure Morton and his camp would vacate the premesis, which could threaten the PC&#8217;s future prospects. However Bronco would likely reposition the party as Alberta&#8217;s &#8220;Progressive&#8221; Conservative party, and ultimately the losers in this situation would be the Liberals. We&#8217;d have a realignment of the party system in Alberta, which is ultimately a good thing, because then we&#8217;d have at least one viable true conservative party in the province, as opposed to the absence of one right now.</p>
<p>I hear you guys, but if Bronco didn&#8217;t end up as PC leader, I&#8217;d be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Unruh</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163113</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Unruh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163113</guid>
		<description>If Dave were thinking about jumping to the provincial PCs, I seriously doubt that he'd be as harsh in his attacks on the government now. To me, his behaviour points to a run at the leadership for the provincial Liberals. Attacking the government lets him prime the conditions for his own leadership run under the guise of standing up for Calgary. His attack on Morton was pointless, except that it probably pleased the silly Liberal activist base in Alberta that thinks Morton is the devil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Dave were thinking about jumping to the provincial PCs, I seriously doubt that he&#8217;d be as harsh in his attacks on the government now. To me, his behaviour points to a run at the leadership for the provincial Liberals. Attacking the government lets him prime the conditions for his own leadership run under the guise of standing up for Calgary. His attack on Morton was pointless, except that it probably pleased the silly Liberal activist base in Alberta that thinks Morton is the devil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163102</link>
		<dc:creator>George Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163102</guid>
		<description>Realistically, depending where Stelmach moves and how adroitly, anyone of the three parties could be a potential minority government; though I suspect the Alliance faces a similar situation to that of the ADQ in Quebec---institutionally immature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realistically, depending where Stelmach moves and how adroitly, anyone of the three parties could be a potential minority government; though I suspect the Alliance faces a similar situation to that of the ADQ in Quebec&#8212;institutionally immature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163101</link>
		<dc:creator>George Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/06/14/could-bronco-buck-conventional-wisdom/#comment-163101</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on Bronco's game.  It all depends on how proud of a Liberal Bronco is, or whether he'll play broker; show that he understands the reality of how hard it is to elect Liberals in Alberta.

HOWEVER, there is another scenario.  Stelmach's game plan seems is seemingly be nice, be quiet, be the compromise leader.  He hasn't really defined what his leadership of the Progressive Conservatives, and the government, means beyond that, compromise.

Any strategist will tell you that in the run up to the next election, having settled into the Premier's office, Stelmach is going to have to start giving Albertan's a more visible, clearly defined face to his government.  And he had better wise up to the fact that he is going to be fighting a two front war; a Liberal minority government not that far fetched.  

While Dinning would have flanked the Liberals to face off against the Alliance; Morton would have done the reverse.  But Stelmach is the compromise candidate!  Unless he stops being the compromise candidate, Bronco could conceivably run as a Liberal and become the next Premier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on Bronco&#8217;s game.  It all depends on how proud of a Liberal Bronco is, or whether he&#8217;ll play broker; show that he understands the reality of how hard it is to elect Liberals in Alberta.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, there is another scenario.  Stelmach&#8217;s game plan seems is seemingly be nice, be quiet, be the compromise leader.  He hasn&#8217;t really defined what his leadership of the Progressive Conservatives, and the government, means beyond that, compromise.</p>
<p>Any strategist will tell you that in the run up to the next election, having settled into the Premier&#8217;s office, Stelmach is going to have to start giving Albertan&#8217;s a more visible, clearly defined face to his government.  And he had better wise up to the fact that he is going to be fighting a two front war; a Liberal minority government not that far fetched.  </p>
<p>While Dinning would have flanked the Liberals to face off against the Alliance; Morton would have done the reverse.  But Stelmach is the compromise candidate!  Unless he stops being the compromise candidate, Bronco could conceivably run as a Liberal and become the next Premier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
