<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Ingenius Strategy to Destroy the Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Siegrid from Kaos</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162207</link>
		<dc:creator>Siegrid from Kaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162207</guid>
		<description>Unst Schmart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unst Schmart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162044</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162044</guid>
		<description>Both the republicans and democrats in the US (Republicats) are socialists. They both want bigger government and more control. The only argument between them is what the priorities should be. The only true republican on either side is Ron Paul who advocates smaller government and less control. No I don't think he has a chance. No I am not an American but I have been reading his writings for Years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the republicans and democrats in the US (Republicats) are socialists. They both want bigger government and more control. The only argument between them is what the priorities should be. The only true republican on either side is Ron Paul who advocates smaller government and less control. No I don&#8217;t think he has a chance. No I am not an American but I have been reading his writings for Years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Cerber</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cerber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162042</guid>
		<description>R.A.:  There are not a few US conservatives who think Bush has forsaken them.  E.g., Andrew Bacevich who sees Bush's foreign policy as Woodrow Wilson full throttle; there was a Cato Institute fellow who wrote a book on Bush's economic policy who said there was nothing conservative about it (since the size of the fed govt has expanded enormously under his watch); some conservatives think Bush's faith-based initiatives are also too big-statist.

Of course, the post was done tongue-in-cheek, but it does implicitly raise the question of, if these have proven the failures of the Bush presidency, whether the policies have been discredited (which pressures Dems to adopt small-state positions in domestic, and realist positions in foreign policy) or whether the people implementing those policies have been discredited.  Or perhaps the distinction isn't that clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.A.:  There are not a few US conservatives who think Bush has forsaken them.  E.g., Andrew Bacevich who sees Bush&#8217;s foreign policy as Woodrow Wilson full throttle; there was a Cato Institute fellow who wrote a book on Bush&#8217;s economic policy who said there was nothing conservative about it (since the size of the fed govt has expanded enormously under his watch); some conservatives think Bush&#8217;s faith-based initiatives are also too big-statist.</p>
<p>Of course, the post was done tongue-in-cheek, but it does implicitly raise the question of, if these have proven the failures of the Bush presidency, whether the policies have been discredited (which pressures Dems to adopt small-state positions in domestic, and realist positions in foreign policy) or whether the people implementing those policies have been discredited.  Or perhaps the distinction isn&#8217;t that clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162037</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/05/29/bushs-ingenius-strategy-to-destroy-the-left/#comment-162037</guid>
		<description>" Bush is secretly a liberal double-agent, designed to discredit what remains of liberalism by adopting some of its historical themes, while driving liberals out of their minds at the same time"

Say what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Bush is secretly a liberal double-agent, designed to discredit what remains of liberalism by adopting some of its historical themes, while driving liberals out of their minds at the same time&#8221;</p>
<p>Say what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
