<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environment: Pulling a Gore-House on Harper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BigCityLib Strikes Back: Has Anyone Checked The Meter On Stornoway?</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156753</link>
		<dc:creator>BigCityLib Strikes Back: Has Anyone Checked The Meter On Stornoway?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156753</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] story, which reveals that the PM's house used $57,000 worth of heat and electricity in 2006, a few Blogging Tory types are already suggesting it. I guess we should be demanding that Harper run a "carbon neutral" [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] story, which reveals that the PM&#8217;s house used $57,000 worth of heat and electricity in 2006, a few Blogging Tory types are already suggesting it. I guess we should be demanding that Harper run a &#8220;carbon neutral&#8221; [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragev</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156747</link>
		<dc:creator>dragev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156747</guid>
		<description>So far this is the contact information I've found:

&lt;b&gt;The Star Phoenix Editorial Department&lt;/b&gt;
Toll-Free: 1-800-667-2002

&lt;b&gt;Letters to the Editor&lt;/b&gt;
Online: http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/letters.html
E-mail: spnews@sp.canwest.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far this is the contact information I&#8217;ve found:</p>
<p><b>The Star Phoenix Editorial Department</b><br />
Toll-Free: 1-800-667-2002</p>
<p><b>Letters to the Editor</b><br />
Online: <a href="http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/letters.html" >http://www.canada.com/saskatoo.....tters.html</a><br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:spnews@sp.canwest.com">spnews@sp.canwest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragev</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156743</link>
		<dc:creator>dragev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156743</guid>
		<description>The author of the article, Glen McGregor, starts his like so: &lt;blockquote&gt;If Prime Minister Stephen Harper is serious about tackling climate change, he might want to start with his own energy-guzzling home.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is an outright lie. As Shane pointed out, Prime Minister Harper does not own 24 Sussux Drive, we the people of Canada do. This article is a first-rate smear job.

This article provokes so much anger that I'm about to look up contact information for Glen McGregor and his editors to express my displeasure. If anyone beats me to it, please post the applicable contact information. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author of the article, Glen McGregor, starts his like so:<br />
<blockquote>If Prime Minister Stephen Harper is serious about tackling climate change, he might want to start with his own energy-guzzling home.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an outright lie. As Shane pointed out, Prime Minister Harper does not own 24 Sussux Drive, we the people of Canada do. This article is a first-rate smear job.</p>
<p>This article provokes so much anger that I&#8217;m about to look up contact information for Glen McGregor and his editors to express my displeasure. If anyone beats me to it, please post the applicable contact information. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156738</guid>
		<description>Do you remember when Rick Mercer visited Paul Martin at 24 Sussex and they put up temporary weathersealing in the conservatory? Paul Martin admitted that the house was drafty, but like Chretien and Mulroney he did nothing about it because the "optics" of spending money on 24 Sussex looked bad. When Harper came to office, he multiplied the budget for repairs at 24 Sussex multiple times. Quite rightly. That building belongs to us, not any politician. If it's leaking heat because it hasn't been looked after properly, it needs fixing and PMSH has made a start on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you remember when Rick Mercer visited Paul Martin at 24 Sussex and they put up temporary weathersealing in the conservatory? Paul Martin admitted that the house was drafty, but like Chretien and Mulroney he did nothing about it because the &#8220;optics&#8221; of spending money on 24 Sussex looked bad. When Harper came to office, he multiplied the budget for repairs at 24 Sussex multiple times. Quite rightly. That building belongs to us, not any politician. If it&#8217;s leaking heat because it hasn&#8217;t been looked after properly, it needs fixing and PMSH has made a start on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Romano</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156733</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Romano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156733</guid>
		<description>Ah the left, hopelessly out of touch and incredibly naive.

Gore is a screwball hack--the man knows no bounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the left, hopelessly out of touch and incredibly naive.</p>
<p>Gore is a screwball hack&#8211;the man knows no bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156732</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/03/28/environment-pulling-a-gore-house-on-harper/#comment-156732</guid>
		<description>Mr. Harper is obviously a heretic.  I would suggest burning him at the stake but that would create uneccessary Co2 emmisions so I opt for redumacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Harper is obviously a heretic.  I would suggest burning him at the stake but that would create uneccessary Co2 emmisions so I opt for redumacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
