<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick and Choose Bylaws &#8211; The Calgary Smoking Ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Farries</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-153324</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Farries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/#comment-153324</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I agree the smoking is a workplace hazard, I just disagree that in order to address this issue, governments have to ban smoking in private establishments.

Rather than banning smoking, why couldn&#039;t governments require establishments, which allow smoking, to have adequate ventilation to minimize the hazard?
&lt;blockquote&gt;Talking science here just doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This isn&#039;t about science, it&#039;s about liberty.

We all make choices - to smoke, or in this case, to work in a establishment that contains smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I agree the smoking is a workplace hazard, I just disagree that in order to address this issue, governments have to ban smoking in private establishments.</p>
<p>Rather than banning smoking, why couldn&#8217;t governments require establishments, which allow smoking, to have adequate ventilation to minimize the hazard?</p>
<blockquote><p>Talking science here just doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t work.</p></blockquote>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about science, it&#8217;s about liberty.</p>
<p>We all make choices &#8211; to smoke, or in this case, to work in a establishment that contains smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sick of Tory Ranting</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-153321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sick of Tory Ranting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/#comment-153321</guid>
		<description>Ryan, save your breath. You know you&#039;re right. I know you&#039;re right. But given the recent posts here on climate change, the bloggers here will drag up some scientist who denies that smoking is at all helpful. Talking science here just doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, save your breath. You know you&#8217;re right. I know you&#8217;re right. But given the recent posts here on climate change, the bloggers here will drag up some scientist who denies that smoking is at all helpful. Talking science here just doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-153137</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/#comment-153137</guid>
		<description>I think this exemption status crap has gone on far to long, all the business&#039; without exemption cry it&#039;s not fair the other places have it, so here&#039;s the fix no exemptions period. But Calgary is full of elected Liberals afterall. Municiple of course, and the mayor himself ran as a Liberal MP in the 2000 election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this exemption status crap has gone on far to long, all the business&#8217; without exemption cry it&#8217;s not fair the other places have it, so here&#8217;s the fix no exemptions period. But Calgary is full of elected Liberals afterall. Municiple of course, and the mayor himself ran as a Liberal MP in the 2000 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-153114</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/16/pick-and-choose-bylaws-the-calgary-smoking-ban/#comment-153114</guid>
		<description>The bans are being put in place because second hand smoke is a proven work place hazard.  People that work in establishments that allow smoking are being exposed to something that may have adverse health consequences.  The rights of smokers are not more important than the right of employees to expect a reasonably safe work environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bans are being put in place because second hand smoke is a proven work place hazard.  People that work in establishments that allow smoking are being exposed to something that may have adverse health consequences.  The rights of smokers are not more important than the right of employees to expect a reasonably safe work environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

