<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the Liberal bench</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A notable exception</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-168476</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A notable exception</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/#comment-168476</guid>
		<description>[...] The following bloggers have trackbacks to this article, why not give their blog a read?ThePolitic.com linked with the Liberal bench [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The following bloggers have trackbacks to this article, why not give their blog a read?ThePolitic.com linked with the Liberal bench [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Winnipeg</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-153052</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Winnipeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/#comment-153052</guid>
		<description>You having a bad day Kelly? What on earth are you talking about?

The water wings starting the chaff?

Here&#039;s one of Harper&#039;s &quot;non-patronage&quot; appointments:

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=bb2bd69b-da49-470a-b907-c7256cd51c80&amp;k=28844</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You having a bad day Kelly? What on earth are you talking about?</p>
<p>The water wings starting the chaff?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one of Harper&#8217;s &#8220;non-patronage&#8221; appointments:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=bb2bd69b-da49-470a-b907-c7256cd51c80&#038;k=28844" >http://www.canada.com/topics/n.....38;k=28844</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly T Konechny</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-153001</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly T Konechny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/#comment-153001</guid>
		<description>Dine on a baby? Can you please cite your references for that remark? He&#039;s not scary, let it go, it didn&#039;t work before and it&#039;s not sticking now.

The PM isn&#039;t giving position to his brother-in-law and former friends, etc. He&#039;s asking for judges that respect law and order by placing a representative from the police on the selections board.

Hypocrisy? One wonders how you can toss out the opening comments that you do and then demand that all of our opinions are backed-up from three different sources. Spare us your sixth-grade, Michael Moore logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dine on a baby? Can you please cite your references for that remark? He&#8217;s not scary, let it go, it didn&#8217;t work before and it&#8217;s not sticking now.</p>
<p>The PM isn&#8217;t giving position to his brother-in-law and former friends, etc. He&#8217;s asking for judges that respect law and order by placing a representative from the police on the selections board.</p>
<p>Hypocrisy? One wonders how you can toss out the opening comments that you do and then demand that all of our opinions are backed-up from three different sources. Spare us your sixth-grade, Michael Moore logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Winnipeg</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-152959</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Winnipeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/#comment-152959</guid>
		<description>Considering the moral outrage expressed over other acts of perceived hypocrisy

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/06/garth-turner-the-hypocrite-if-they-decide-to-change-parties-they-should-go-and-get-re-elected/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/20...-get-re-elected/&lt;/a&gt;

One wonders what PMSH would have to do to earn similar outrage from this crowd.  Perhaps when he finally does dine on a baby?

&quot;These are among the most serious examples of partisan interference in judicial appointments that have ever been heard in this country.&quot;

&quot;The Liberals have undermined Canadians&#039; confidence in our political system and even manipulated our judicial system.&quot;

Who said that (and a lot more on the topic)... this guy:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=28a4008e-f81c-4627-806a-b838d6c49461&amp;k=68135&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.canada.com/...c-4627-806a-b838d6c49461&amp;k=68135&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the moral outrage expressed over other acts of perceived hypocrisy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/06/garth-turner-the-hypocrite-if-they-decide-to-change-parties-they-should-go-and-get-re-elected/" >http://www.thepolitic.com/arch.....e-elected/</a></p>
<p>One wonders what PMSH would have to do to earn similar outrage from this crowd.  Perhaps when he finally does dine on a baby?</p>
<p>&#8220;These are among the most serious examples of partisan interference in judicial appointments that have ever been heard in this country.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Liberals have undermined Canadians&#8217; confidence in our political system and even manipulated our judicial system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who said that (and a lot more on the topic)&#8230; this guy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=28a4008e-f81c-4627-806a-b838d6c49461&amp;k=68135" >http://www.canada.com/&#8230;c.....38;k=68135</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TangoJuliette</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-152954</link>
		<dc:creator>TangoJuliette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/02/14/the-liberal-bench/#comment-152954</guid>
		<description>of course.  they, and only they, the Libranos, are entitled to their entitlements.  Sorta like the little matador with the Elvis Bouffant and the Miami Vice - Village Peoples designer five o&#039;clock shadow, dim-bulbishly mocking Harper as &quot;the New Emperor...&quot;

Is that a tacit admission on the part of the Liberals that they have always seen the PM-ship as their Constant Emperorship?  They&#039;ve always conducted themselves that way . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course.  they, and only they, the Libranos, are entitled to their entitlements.  Sorta like the little matador with the Elvis Bouffant and the Miami Vice &#8211; Village Peoples designer five o&#8217;clock shadow, dim-bulbishly mocking Harper as &#8220;the New Emperor&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that a tacit admission on the part of the Liberals that they have always seen the PM-ship as their Constant Emperorship?  They&#8217;ve always conducted themselves that way . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

