<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have Surplus, Will Spend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: metalguru</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-149657</link>
		<dc:creator>metalguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/#comment-149657</guid>
		<description>How can a soft dictatorship running a country of drooling dependants of the state they created in the first place keep going if it does&#039;nt have the power of the purse?

Stephen Harper MUST win a majority in the next election or we can kiss the bit of freedom and strength of caracter that&#039;s left in some harts and minds of this once proud country.

Mediocrity is well entrenched in our socialist gulag, the next election will tell us if it&#039;s too late to get out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a soft dictatorship running a country of drooling dependants of the state they created in the first place keep going if it does&#8217;nt have the power of the purse?</p>
<p>Stephen Harper MUST win a majority in the next election or we can kiss the bit of freedom and strength of caracter that&#8217;s left in some harts and minds of this once proud country.</p>
<p>Mediocrity is well entrenched in our socialist gulag, the next election will tell us if it&#8217;s too late to get out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-149645</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/#comment-149645</guid>
		<description>I find the most nutty statement from that quote is where the author exhibits that final sign of senility - a failure of differentiation between human beings.

I have news for you: HARPER IS NOT BUSH!  He doesn&#039;t LOOK like Bush!  He doesn&#039;t TALK like Bush!  He doesn&#039;t have the same education!  He isn&#039;t from the same country!  He doesn&#039;t have the same policies!  This is not a valid form of argument:

1.  Bush is an idiot. (assumed by argumentor to be self evident)
2.  Harper is Bush. (again, assumed)
3.  Bush does this.  (perhaps the only semi-fact in this entire chain of reasonins)
4.  Therefore Harper does this. (without proof or basis other than statement 2.)
5.  Therefore Harper is an idiot.
Therefore Harper is an idiot.

My conclusion: Dimitry is an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the most nutty statement from that quote is where the author exhibits that final sign of senility &#8211; a failure of differentiation between human beings.</p>
<p>I have news for you: HARPER IS NOT BUSH!  He doesn&#8217;t LOOK like Bush!  He doesn&#8217;t TALK like Bush!  He doesn&#8217;t have the same education!  He isn&#8217;t from the same country!  He doesn&#8217;t have the same policies!  This is not a valid form of argument:</p>
<p>1.  Bush is an idiot. (assumed by argumentor to be self evident)<br />
2.  Harper is Bush. (again, assumed)<br />
3.  Bush does this.  (perhaps the only semi-fact in this entire chain of reasonins)<br />
4.  Therefore Harper does this. (without proof or basis other than statement 2.)<br />
5.  Therefore Harper is an idiot.<br />
Therefore Harper is an idiot.</p>
<p>My conclusion: Dimitry is an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Cybulski</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-149643</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Cybulski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/02/have-surplus-will-spend/#comment-149643</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Liberals really do have no sense of economics at all. I like to put it this way: If they knew anything about economics, they wouldn&#039;t be Liberals.

You can see a good summary of this here: http://purpletory.blogspot.com/2006/12/little-economics-101-for-citoyen-dion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Liberals really do have no sense of economics at all. I like to put it this way: If they knew anything about economics, they wouldn&#8217;t be Liberals.</p>
<p>You can see a good summary of this here: <a href="http://purpletory.blogspot.com/2006/12/little-economics-101-for-citoyen-dion.html" >http://purpletory.blogspot.com.....-dion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
