Comments on: Honest Ed Stelmach? http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/ Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:24:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Jaunque http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-160623 Jaunque Thu, 03 May 2007 04:33:52 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-160623 wha?? wha??

]]> By: Barb Harrison http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-160618 Barb Harrison Thu, 03 May 2007 01:01:33 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-160618 Premier Stelmach, I just wanted you ro know that I have purchased your Buick Alure at Beaverhill Motors in Tofield. I am very please with the car and am honored to be able to own it. I am a senior citizen of Tofield for sevemteen years, previous to that I was the receptionist for the County of Beaver No.9. I well remember you coming into our County as a young MLA and saying you will do just fine in the future, never knowing you would be Premier. Never the less I noticed from our local paper in Tofield you are coming to the Sodbusters Rodeo in May, and I so much would like to meet you again. If this is possible please confirm. Sincerely Barb Harrison Premier Stelmach, I just wanted you ro know that I have purchased your Buick Alure
at Beaverhill Motors in Tofield. I am very please with the car and am honored to be
able to own it. I am a senior citizen of Tofield for sevemteen years, previous to that I was the receptionist for the County of Beaver No.9. I well remember you coming into our County as a young MLA and saying you will do just fine in the future, never knowing you would be Premier. Never the less I noticed from our local paper in Tofield you are coming to the Sodbusters Rodeo in May, and I so much would like to meet you again. If this is possible please confirm.

Sincerely Barb Harrison

]]> By: Aaron Unruh http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148885 Aaron Unruh Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:59:48 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148885 "I would be more specific but that comes across as slander, which happens to be frowned uppon from what I hear." It's possible to be more specific within slandering those involved. Otherwise, this comes across as unsubstantiated mud-throwing. “I would be more specific but that comes across as slander, which happens to be frowned uppon from what I hear.”

It’s possible to be more specific within slandering those involved. Otherwise, this comes across as unsubstantiated mud-throwing.

]]> By: kaqchikel http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148874 kaqchikel Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:38:02 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148874 Challenge accepted, anon. Did Ed ever placed caveats during the campaign as to whose names he would or would not reveal? If I missed that, please show me that I'm wrong by pointing at the record and I'd be happy to correct. Challenge accepted, anon. Did Ed ever placed caveats during the campaign as to whose names he would or would not reveal? If I missed that, please show me that I’m wrong by pointing at the record and I’d be happy to correct.

]]> By: Greg Farries http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148873 Greg Farries Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:37:58 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148873 <blockquote>I challenge you to leave this comment up, but somehow I don’t think you will, as it doesn’t fit with your agenda.</blockquote> Oh ya, cause we're always taking down comments that don't fit our "agenda." Nice try Anon,

I challenge you to leave this comment up, but somehow I don’t think you will, as it doesn’t fit with your agenda.

Oh ya, cause we’re always taking down comments that don’t fit our “agenda.”

Nice try Anon,

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148871 Anonymous Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:48:56 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148871 Everyone should look into the background of Stelmach's Cabinet members, theirs some real shiners in their when it comes to the law. I would be more specific but that comes across as slander, which happens to be frowned uppon from what I hear. Everyone should look into the background of Stelmach’s Cabinet members, theirs some real shiners in their when it comes to the law. I would be more specific but that comes across as slander, which happens to be frowned uppon from what I hear.

]]> By: Anon http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148870 Anon Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:39:35 +0000 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/12/19/honest-ed-stelmach/#comment-148870 You are misrepresenting Ed here. Ed NEVER said that he would post the names of donors who asked to remain anonymous. To do so would in fact be going against his word. For you to say Ed went back on his word days after accepting office is complete rubbish. Get your facts straight. What about your good friend Ted? Any donor disclosure yet? Your hyposcrisy is stunning. I challenge you to leave this comment up, but somehow I don't think you will, as it doesn't fit with your agenda. You are misrepresenting Ed here. Ed NEVER said that he would post the names of donors who asked to remain anonymous. To do so would in fact be going against his word. For you to say Ed went back on his word days after accepting office is complete rubbish. Get your facts straight.

What about your good friend Ted? Any donor disclosure yet? Your hyposcrisy is stunning.

I challenge you to leave this comment up, but somehow I don’t think you will, as it doesn’t fit with your agenda.

]]>