<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Party of Alberta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.Courtman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-147775</link>
		<dc:creator>R.Courtman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/#comment-147775</guid>
		<description>The Party of Alberta simply wants Alberta to exercise more of its constitutional rights and assert its authority over matters which are within its jurisdiction.  We believe that would be a better deal for Alberta.

As for being &#039;front and centre&#039; - I agree, that all regions should be represented equally.  However, the fact is that Alberta&#039;s interests simply get shuffled to the side, no matter the Party in power - politics in Canada is a numbers game, and the fact is that Majority Country has more than we do, and fully 70% of the seats in the House are east of the Manitoba-Ontario border.  

They will come first;  and &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://partyofalberta.blogspot.com/2006/11/is-alberta-agenda-still-relevant.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ted Morton has said the same&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.  That doesn&#039;t bode well when our interests differ from theirs, as they quite often do.

As for the APP... well, if you were a politician from Ontario or the Maritimes - with lagging economies and aging populations - the idea of the younger, more prosperous Albertans opting out of the CPP to form its own pension would put your own retirees in a precarious spot.  I can see a battle brewing over that one, and the Feds trying to use legislation to bar the creation of an independent Alberta Pension Plan.  

Now, I sincerely would hope I&#039;m wrong, and that an APP can be created without a hitch and without ruffling feathers in Ontario or elsewhere.  But in case I&#039;m not - I can see the value in having a strong and independent Albertan voice in Parliament.

And I&#039;m in Morton&#039;s corner for Saturday, no doubt - and am encouraging everyone I can to come out for the vote for him, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Party of Alberta simply wants Alberta to exercise more of its constitutional rights and assert its authority over matters which are within its jurisdiction.  We believe that would be a better deal for Alberta.</p>
<p>As for being &#8216;front and centre&#8217; &#8211; I agree, that all regions should be represented equally.  However, the fact is that Alberta&#8217;s interests simply get shuffled to the side, no matter the Party in power &#8211; politics in Canada is a numbers game, and the fact is that Majority Country has more than we do, and fully 70% of the seats in the House are east of the Manitoba-Ontario border.  </p>
<p>They will come first;  and <b><a href="http://partyofalberta.blogspot.com/2006/11/is-alberta-agenda-still-relevant.html" >Ted Morton has said the same</a></b>.  That doesn&#8217;t bode well when our interests differ from theirs, as they quite often do.</p>
<p>As for the APP&#8230; well, if you were a politician from Ontario or the Maritimes &#8211; with lagging economies and aging populations &#8211; the idea of the younger, more prosperous Albertans opting out of the CPP to form its own pension would put your own retirees in a precarious spot.  I can see a battle brewing over that one, and the Feds trying to use legislation to bar the creation of an independent Alberta Pension Plan.  </p>
<p>Now, I sincerely would hope I&#8217;m wrong, and that an APP can be created without a hitch and without ruffling feathers in Ontario or elsewhere.  But in case I&#8217;m not &#8211; I can see the value in having a strong and independent Albertan voice in Parliament.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m in Morton&#8217;s corner for Saturday, no doubt &#8211; and am encouraging everyone I can to come out for the vote for him, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-147770</link>
		<dc:creator>George Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/#comment-147770</guid>
		<description>Well said Jon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Jon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-147746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/#comment-147746</guid>
		<description>It is not because he is an Albertan that Harper is Alberta&#039;s best hope, it is because he respects the constitutional division of powers, rights and responsibilities between the Federal and Provincial governments.  

It&#039;s a big country, I don&#039;t need to be front and centre all the time, I just need to be treated fairly.

Why should the creation of an Alberta Pension Plan be met with hostility, and why should that affect our actions?  It&#039;s too late to help me, but it will sure give my kids a better deal than I&#039;m gonna get from Ottawa.

If you want to kick somebody off their complacency I suggest you get active in the PC leadership and boost Morton for all your worth, it&#039;s the only horse in sight with any hope of paying off.  Ottawa is nothing but a costly distraction this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not because he is an Albertan that Harper is Alberta&#8217;s best hope, it is because he respects the constitutional division of powers, rights and responsibilities between the Federal and Provincial governments.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a big country, I don&#8217;t need to be front and centre all the time, I just need to be treated fairly.</p>
<p>Why should the creation of an Alberta Pension Plan be met with hostility, and why should that affect our actions?  It&#8217;s too late to help me, but it will sure give my kids a better deal than I&#8217;m gonna get from Ottawa.</p>
<p>If you want to kick somebody off their complacency I suggest you get active in the PC leadership and boost Morton for all your worth, it&#8217;s the only horse in sight with any hope of paying off.  Ottawa is nothing but a costly distraction this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.Courtman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-147734</link>
		<dc:creator>R.Courtman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/#comment-147734</guid>
		<description>Harper being an Albertan has about as much influence on his being Prime Minister as being Albertan had on Joe Clark - that&#039;s to say, not much at all.

Harper and the Conservatives want a majority government, that&#039;s no secret.  Unfortunately, though, the road to majority doesn&#039;t run through Calgary nor Edmonton... so Albertan issues and concerns are oft ignored or sidelined for the sake of &#039;national&#039; interests - or for the sake of garnering votes in &quot;Majority Country.&quot;

Several ideas and proposals put forth by Morton - who I agree is the best choice for Premier of Alberta - would be met with hostility by those same &#039;Majority Country&#039; votes which the Conservatives are seeking.  Foremost of those, would be the withdrawal of Alberta from the Canada Pension Plan and the creation of our own Pension system.  

In such a scenario, the Conservatives (or Liberals) would thus be wise to resist such and attempt in order to gain or maintain a majority in Parliament.

Personnally, I would rather have a federal Party representing Albertans, and Albertans only.  Other reasons why have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/06/19/debunking-the-nine-per-cent-solution-fighting-the-futility-of-federalism-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;penned on this very site&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, some time ago.

Besides which, the Conservatives elected in Alberta, save for a few seats in and around Edmonton, have felt secure enough in their ridings to forego campaigning there, as recently as last election.  Those MPs could well use a kick in their complacency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harper being an Albertan has about as much influence on his being Prime Minister as being Albertan had on Joe Clark &#8211; that&#8217;s to say, not much at all.</p>
<p>Harper and the Conservatives want a majority government, that&#8217;s no secret.  Unfortunately, though, the road to majority doesn&#8217;t run through Calgary nor Edmonton&#8230; so Albertan issues and concerns are oft ignored or sidelined for the sake of &#8216;national&#8217; interests &#8211; or for the sake of garnering votes in &#8220;Majority Country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Several ideas and proposals put forth by Morton &#8211; who I agree is the best choice for Premier of Alberta &#8211; would be met with hostility by those same &#8216;Majority Country&#8217; votes which the Conservatives are seeking.  Foremost of those, would be the withdrawal of Alberta from the Canada Pension Plan and the creation of our own Pension system.  </p>
<p>In such a scenario, the Conservatives (or Liberals) would thus be wise to resist such and attempt in order to gain or maintain a majority in Parliament.</p>
<p>Personnally, I would rather have a federal Party representing Albertans, and Albertans only.  Other reasons why have been <a href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/06/19/debunking-the-nine-per-cent-solution-fighting-the-futility-of-federalism-2/" ><b>penned on this very site</b></a>, some time ago.</p>
<p>Besides which, the Conservatives elected in Alberta, save for a few seats in and around Edmonton, have felt secure enough in their ridings to forego campaigning there, as recently as last election.  Those MPs could well use a kick in their complacency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-147727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/11/27/the-party-of-alberta/#comment-147727</guid>
		<description>I think the Party of Alberta is a waste of time.  Those battles are better fought from Edmonton with a strong provincial Morton government than from Ottawa with a powerless splinter group, assuming any could even get elected.

Alberta&#039;s best hope federally is to keep on electing Harper, we don&#039;t need flies in the ointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Party of Alberta is a waste of time.  Those battles are better fought from Edmonton with a strong provincial Morton government than from Ottawa with a powerless splinter group, assuming any could even get elected.</p>
<p>Alberta&#8217;s best hope federally is to keep on electing Harper, we don&#8217;t need flies in the ointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

