<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Non-Religious Arguments Against SSM:  Parts 3-4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some who knows</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/comment-page-1/#comment-214206</link>
		<dc:creator>Some who knows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/#comment-214206</guid>
		<description>Okay, your arguments for 3-4 are foolish and ignorant. 
Number 3: You argue as though homosexuality is a choice.Its obvious you have not done any kind of research or fact backing up your idea because if you have you would know it is not a choice. if you accept it or not it still exist and forever will marriage is not going to have a factor on that.
Number 4:A person may be gay and maintain there virginity just as well as a heterosexual. when you say &quot;A teenager calls himself homosexual because he has performed homosexual acts.&quot; (and let me assume you are heterosexual) i&#039;m you knew you liked people of the opposite sex before you have done sexual stuff with them. Please put further thought into your reasons before you post them into reality .
                                                 -i hope you see things in a deferent way
                                                  ~Day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, your arguments for 3-4 are foolish and ignorant.<br />
Number 3: You argue as though homosexuality is a choice.Its obvious you have not done any kind of research or fact backing up your idea because if you have you would know it is not a choice. if you accept it or not it still exist and forever will marriage is not going to have a factor on that.<br />
Number 4:A person may be gay and maintain there virginity just as well as a heterosexual. when you say &#8220;A teenager calls himself homosexual because he has performed homosexual acts.&#8221; (and let me assume you are heterosexual) i&#8217;m you knew you liked people of the opposite sex before you have done sexual stuff with them. Please put further thought into your reasons before you post them into reality .<br />
                                                 -i hope you see things in a deferent way<br />
                                                  ~Day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Non-Religious Arguments Against SSM: Parts 5-6 at ThePolitic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/comment-page-1/#comment-119451</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Non-Religious Arguments Against SSM: Parts 5-6 at ThePolitic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2006/08/01/10-non-religious-arguments-against-ssm-parts-3-4/#comment-119451</guid>
		<description>[...] See here for Parts 1-4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See here for Parts 1-4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

