Think red light cameras save lives? Think again, thenewspaper.com has a roundup on the REAL effects red light cameras have on traffic collisions - they actually increase the amount of accidents.
-
RSS Links
Recent Comments
- pxfragonard commented on Let US Army deserters stay in Canada
- Trailer Park commented on Bloc MP Fr. Raymond Gravel ordered by Vatican to choose between priesthood and politics
- glacialgal commented on Oprah’s an Obama Booster - Palin isn’t Welcome…
- glacialgal commented on Liz May’s Brilliance In Action - Please Let Me In Debate…Or Else!
- glacialgal commented on Exhibit #Umpteen the Only Fashionable Bigotry in Canada is Against Christians
Speller wrote:
Speed traps and MutiNova cameras are all about money too.
There is never an annual decrease in speeders and police base budget projections on this fact.
It’s highway robbery, but accepted as a fact of police culture.
Posted on 25-Apr-06 at 10:52 am | Permalink
ferrethouse wrote:
I hate people who run red lights. Personally, I would favor a system that changed the timing of the lights ahead of a driver who runs a red light so that they have to stop for an extended period of time at the next light (like 30 minutes).
Posted on 07-May-06 at 3:00 pm | Permalink
Jeff wrote:
Just like with photoradar, I would have thought this conclusion would be obvious to anyone.
Posted on 08-May-06 at 7:49 am | Permalink
Canadian Cynic wrote:
Holden notices a terribly, terribly disturbing trend in journamalism these days — unsourced conjecture and speculation. Holden is also stunned to learn that red-light cameras could be nothing more than (gasp! horrors!) acheap cash grab. Pete gets way too Freudian. Tune in next week when Holden is taken aback by Stephen Harper’s recent lack of accountability and transparency, and Pete tells someone to suck his dick. In a purely heterosexual way, of course.
Posted on 08-May-06 at 11:12 am | Permalink