Zing!: MacMillan on Travers
April 16, 2006 · By Peter Rempel
Here:
The word “choice” is not considered a “euphanism” when it comes to the question of abortion policy – so, why does Travers attempt to discredit choice when the issue is child care or health care?
Liberal Shangri-La: Women have control over their own uteruses but no say whatsoever over how their children are cared for.
Liberal choice is only free choice when you chose as they and the Liberal state would. Interestingly, Mussolini thought about the same when it came to life in a fascist state: freedom is to do the will of the state.
My simplistic definition of a liberal is
one who decides who gets to join the club and then works toward giving them unlimited rights.
Heh.
–name removed–:
The government of Canada gave women the “choice” by creating more daycare spaces?!? More like hard working taxpayers. And because I have to pay for your government daycare space I can’t afford to stay home and care for my child. Why should SOME people get a free ride?
Only 1 out of every 8 children in Canada will get a space under the Liberal plan. Can you imagine the outcry if that ratio applied to health care!?
Pathetic. I’m sick of paying other people’s bills.
Lyndon, sweetie – name me one Liberal created daycare space.
Gevalia Coffee…
[...]Try one pound of our exceptional coffee for only. Including shipping and handling and receive a cup programmable stainless steel coffeemaker as a special gift. Try one pound of our exception[...]…