<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charter and Incest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Cerber</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64072</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cerber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64072</guid>
		<description>Lyndon:  I've posted my response &lt;a href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/11/02/incest-and-the-charter-revisited/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyndon:  I&#8217;ve posted my response <a href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/11/02/incest-and-the-charter-revisited/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic - Canadian Political Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Incest and the Charter Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64071</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic - Canadian Political Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Incest and the Charter Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64071</guid>
		<description>[...] My response to a comment on my previous blog on the case of an incestuous &#8220;marriage&#8221; demands an extended response. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My response to a comment on my previous blog on the case of an incestuous &#8220;marriage&#8221; demands an extended response. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndon Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64070</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndon Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/10/29/charter-and-incest/#comment-64070</guid>
		<description>Give me a break, Tom.  Do you really believe that the new definition of marriage opens the door to incest?  If it did, then why, pray tell, were these two charged and convicted?  If marriage is such an important issues, then shouldn't the people who dole out marriage licences check to see if people are actually legally able to marry?  The problem isn't with the definition, but with the administration of the institution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break, Tom.  Do you really believe that the new definition of marriage opens the door to incest?  If it did, then why, pray tell, were these two charged and convicted?  If marriage is such an important issues, then shouldn&#8217;t the people who dole out marriage licences check to see if people are actually legally able to marry?  The problem isn&#8217;t with the definition, but with the administration of the institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
