Via Sara MacIntyre at the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, the Vancouver Sun reports that 3 million Canadians work for government (either federal, provincial, or municipal), which is the highest ever:
“In total, close to 2.67 million people were working in the three levels of government — the highest level since 1994,” Statistics Canada said. However, it noted that was still slightly below the peak of 2.73 million in 1992, prior to the start of deep cuts in public-sector jobs by deficit-ridden provincial and federal governments.
Just more than half of all government workers were provincial or territorial civil servants, nearly a third were local government employees and 14 per cent were federal public servants, it said, adding that those proportions have remained relatively stable.
Government employment, which excludes those working for government business enterprises, has been increasing steadily since hitting a low of just over 2.5 million in 1999, with all three levels of government contributing to the 160,000 increase.
The provincial and territorial governments combined had nearly 1.4 million employees in 2004, up by 98,000 from 1999, while federal employment rose by 38,000 to 367,000, and local employment by 23,000 to 908,000.
…
The federal government, which underwent sharper percentage decreases in employment during the 1990s, has also posted steeper increases since 2000, although in total numbers the greatest increases have been at the provincial and local government levels.
Just over half of all provincial and territorial employees work for a health and social service institution, one-quarter are employed by the provincial and territorial general governments, and the remainder work for colleges and universities.
…
A criticism of Canadian job growth this year is that it has all been in either public service jobs, up by 45,000, or in self-employment. “In contrast, the number of private-sector employees has declined by 39,000 over the first four months of the year,” Statistics Canada said in its latest monthly jobs report.
Two dangers can be identified here:
1) governments can only pay its employees through tax revenues, which must be raised by taxing private enterprises, which is taking up a smaller and smaller part of the economy;
2) it’s bad for democracy when such a large percentage of “citizens” depend for their livelihoods on government’s policies and decisions. Edmund Burke called such people “pensioners.” Considered more closely, this dependence undermines the ability for citizens to speak out against government policies because they must constantly weigh whether their superiors will take revenge by denying them employment, promotion, a raise, or perhaps vengeance will be taken against their friend or their spouse. Consider the case of a Quesnel, BC, teacher/councillor who got fired over letters he wrote to a local newspaper critical of the school board’s policy toward sexual orientation. Moreover, how many people who work in private enterprise are married to or are otherwise very close to someone who does work for government? To what extent does fear of what might happen to a loved one hinder their criticisms of governmental policy?

Lyndon Simmons wrote:
Which would be worse for democracy? Having enough, or not having enough employees to design, implement, manage and evaluate government policy? Citizens are demanding more services and work from governments, which is why governments, in turn, need to hire more employees.
And, whereas it is true that governments pay their employees from tax revenues, it is also important to remember that these employees also pay taxes (thus, effectively, paying part of their own wages).
I also think it is a pretty big stretch to claim that all government employees (and their families) are being held hostage by fear. If anyone failed in the case in Quenel, it was the union who is charged with protecting the rights of their employees.
Posted on 30-May-05 at 6:43 am | Permalink
ThePolitic - Canadian Political Weblog » A message from the Government of Canada: stick ‘em up! wrote:
[…]
Tom Cerber’s recent points on the growing size and scope of Canadian government are wor […]
Posted on 30-May-05 at 7:22 am | Permalink
Tom wrote:
Wow, so by implication what brought down the USSR was that it couldn’t hire enough state operatives? Questions about liberty, civil association, pluralism, responsible government, or self-government aren’t as problematic as the technical question of hiring enough people?
Yes, Canadians are demanding more and more from their government. But shouldn’t Canadians also examine whether that’s such a good idea? Do we really need government to wipe our bums and blow our noses for us? If we asked that of our government, would you still respond that it’s up to government to hire the right amount of bum wipers and nose blowers?
Posted on 30-May-05 at 12:10 pm | Permalink
ThePolitic - Canadian Political Weblog » Ken Dryden: No Place for Liberty wrote:
[…] As for his rhetorical question speculating if the government had simply doled out $100 to people 100 years ago, one can respond by speculating what society will look like when government has taken over all aspects of Canadian society. For instance, 3 million Canadians, about 10% of the total population, work for one level of government (including federal, provincial, and municipal). Having so many “pensioners” (Edmund Burke’s term) is bad for society because it makes for dependence and stifles dissent (who’d criticize government if their job was on the line?). Moreover, means Canada has a sizeable faction directly interested in the expansion of government. […]
Posted on 31-Jan-06 at 12:38 pm | Permalink