<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Definition of Marriage Constitutional:  Legal Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/29/traditional-definition-of-marriage-constitutional-legal-expert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/29/traditional-definition-of-marriage-constitutional-legal-expert/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Cerber</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/29/traditional-definition-of-marriage-constitutional-legal-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cerber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/29/traditional-definition-of-marriage-constitutional-legal-expert/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court knows this very well.  For them, nothing is even written.  Nothing exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court knows this very well.  For them, nothing is even written.  Nothing exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

