<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada:  Next Failed State?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SajniB</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-73101</link>
		<dc:creator>SajniB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-73101</guid>
		<description>If I ever live in a province that joins the USA, I will leave and go to another Cdn province.  If they all join the US I will move to England.  There's nothing remotely of interest to me in being part of the US.  Why would I want to be part of a country that has no socialized medicine, guns without limitations and a government that invades and abuses other nations like a school yard bully?  The US (The only country without a name), has a poor education system.  Just once, I want to be able to visit a state that doesn't border Canada, and has people who understand that Canada is a country in North America.  I can't tell you the number of times they have referred to Canada as 'over seas'.  When they become peaceful, law abiding, socially concerned and educated, maybe I want feel so strongly.

If Canada ever joins the US, I sincerely hope I am not alive to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I ever live in a province that joins the USA, I will leave and go to another Cdn province.  If they all join the US I will move to England.  There&#8217;s nothing remotely of interest to me in being part of the US.  Why would I want to be part of a country that has no socialized medicine, guns without limitations and a government that invades and abuses other nations like a school yard bully?  The US (The only country without a name), has a poor education system.  Just once, I want to be able to visit a state that doesn&#8217;t border Canada, and has people who understand that Canada is a country in North America.  I can&#8217;t tell you the number of times they have referred to Canada as &#8216;over seas&#8217;.  When they become peaceful, law abiding, socially concerned and educated, maybe I want feel so strongly.</p>
<p>If Canada ever joins the US, I sincerely hope I am not alive to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why would make anyone think that going from one province in ten to one state in 51 would be preferable?&lt;/i&gt;

You're comparing apples to oranges.  It has to do more with the autonomy of individual states rather than with percentages.  The two governmental systems you're attempting to compare are incompatible.

The United States of America is a republic rather than an empire.  The Sheeple's Republic of Canada is an all-encompassing highly centralized government which regularly and repeatedly trounces on the rights of individuals.  In 2005 it resembles more of an empire than the United Kingdom ever did in the 18th century.  So a more apt question should be, "Why would anyone think that remaining one province in ten would be preferable to being one state in 51?"  Think about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why would make anyone think that going from one province in ten to one state in 51 would be preferable?</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re comparing apples to oranges.  It has to do more with the autonomy of individual states rather than with percentages.  The two governmental systems you&#8217;re attempting to compare are incompatible.</p>
<p>The United States of America is a republic rather than an empire.  The Sheeple&#8217;s Republic of Canada is an all-encompassing highly centralized government which regularly and repeatedly trounces on the rights of individuals.  In 2005 it resembles more of an empire than the United Kingdom ever did in the 18th century.  So a more apt question should be, &#8220;Why would anyone think that remaining one province in ten would be preferable to being one state in 51?&#8221;  Think about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic -  &#187; Separatist Posturing</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic -  &#187; Separatist Posturing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>[...] t I&#8217;d provide a bit of context for prognostications about whether Canada is a failed state or people.  	 	 	                         	 	 	        [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] t I&#8217;d provide a bit of context for prognostications about whether Canada is a failed state or people.  	</p>
<p> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I don't think BC would be chomping at the bit to go it alone either, just because Quebec left.  BC is full of socialists, just look at past NDP provincial governments.  I don't know who'd be stupider - the US for accepting the moribund Maritimes, or the Martimers for leaving their sugar daddy Ontario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think BC would be chomping at the bit to go it alone either, just because Quebec left.  BC is full of socialists, just look at past NDP provincial governments.  I don&#8217;t know who&#8217;d be stupider - the US for accepting the moribund Maritimes, or the Martimers for leaving their sugar daddy Ontario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rempelia Prime &#187; Post-Quebec Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rempelia Prime &#187; Post-Quebec Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>[...] ow('Post-Quebec Canada');"&#62; writeLink('Post-Quebec Canada')       		Via Tom at The Politic comes this post-Quebec separation prognostication from Austin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ow(&#8217;Post-Quebec Canada&#8217;);&#8221;&gt;<br />
 writeLink(&#8217;Post-Quebec Canada&#8217;)</p>
<p> 		Via Tom at The Politic comes this post-Quebec separation prognostication from Austin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/04/27/canada-next-failed-state/#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Whle I would venture that Canada as a state is failing rapidly, I don't understand why our friends to the south insist on prognosticating about Alberta joining the Union.

In my conversations with Albertans on the subject, there is very little solid support for any kind of secession, no matter how preferable it may be to the status quo. Of those who do hold a desire to secede, I can think of a rare few who have any desire to become the 51st state.

Why would make anyone think that going from one province in ten to one state in 51 would be preferable?

Alberta sinks or swims on its own, either inside or outside of Confederation.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whle I would venture that Canada as a state is failing rapidly, I don&#8217;t understand why our friends to the south insist on prognosticating about Alberta joining the Union.</p>
<p>In my conversations with Albertans on the subject, there is very little solid support for any kind of secession, no matter how preferable it may be to the status quo. Of those who do hold a desire to secede, I can think of a rare few who have any desire to become the 51st state.</p>
<p>Why would make anyone think that going from one province in ten to one state in 51 would be preferable?</p>
<p>Alberta sinks or swims on its own, either inside or outside of Confederation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
