<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homosexuality, Newspeak, and Censorship:  Bishop Henry Hit with Human Rights Complaint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Political Forums &#62; Liberal family values for our children</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-162384</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Forums &#62; Liberal family values for our children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-162384</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] in Calgary???    eureka Nov 29 2005, 03:11 PM   Why was he?    newbie Nov 29 2005, 03:18 PM   http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03...and-censorship/    eureka Nov 29 2005, 03:33 PM   The point, I think, is that it was merely a complaint: whether it [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] in Calgary???    eureka Nov 29 2005, 03:11 PM   Why was he?    newbie Nov 29 2005, 03:18 PM   <a href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03...and-censorship/" >http://www.thepolitic.com/arch.....ensorship/</a>    eureka Nov 29 2005, 03:33 PM   The point, I think, is that it was merely a complaint: whether it [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic.com &#187; Gay Rights Trump Religious Rights in Saskatchewan: Consequence of Same Sex Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-151740</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic.com &#187; Gay Rights Trump Religious Rights in Saskatchewan: Consequence of Same Sex Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-151740</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t mind saying, but I TOLD YOU SO.   This entry was written by Tom Cerber and posted on Wed Jan 31, 2007 at 5:12 pm and filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t mind saying, but I TOLD YOU SO.   This entry was written by Tom Cerber and posted on Wed Jan 31, 2007 at 5:12 pm and filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-28718</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-28718</guid>
		<description>'The originator of the Charter intended to protect people from being denied employment or access to education and other benefits simply on the basis of sex (male or female) not sexual orientation!'

Trudeau created the charter.  He also legalized homosexuality, and has the famous quote atributed to him 'The state has no bussiness in the bedrooms of the nation'.

Yeah... i'm pretty sure 'the originator' would have including 'sexual orientation' if such language was avialable at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The originator of the Charter intended to protect people from being denied employment or access to education and other benefits simply on the basis of sex (male or female) not sexual orientation!&#8217;</p>
<p>Trudeau created the charter.  He also legalized homosexuality, and has the famous quote atributed to him &#8216;The state has no bussiness in the bedrooms of the nation&#8217;.</p>
<p>Yeah&#8230; i&#8217;m pretty sure &#8216;the originator&#8217; would have including &#8217;sexual orientation&#8217; if such language was avialable at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-22775</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-22775</guid>
		<description>Why is it not considered hate propaganda towards a group of persons for a union sponsored publication to blanket label Stephen Harper's supporters who subscribe to faith based values as "religious quacks" but if a leader of a religious group states that group's position on a certain issue he has a complaint loged against him?  People of faith are being freely discriminated against in Canada.  To have a simple faith in the Holy Bible is fast becoming a crime in a society where "it's in the Charter studid" applies more clearly to regious freedom than to the reference to sex.  The originator of the Charter intended to protect people from being denied employment or access to education and other benefits simply on the basis of sex (male or female) not sexual orientation!  If the interpretation is to be enlarged to include sexual orientation ... than why are we discriminating against bi-sexual people?  Shouldn't they be allowed to marry one of each kind, male and female? Let's go all the way people!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it not considered hate propaganda towards a group of persons for a union sponsored publication to blanket label Stephen Harper&#8217;s supporters who subscribe to faith based values as &#8220;religious quacks&#8221; but if a leader of a religious group states that group&#8217;s position on a certain issue he has a complaint loged against him?  People of faith are being freely discriminated against in Canada.  To have a simple faith in the Holy Bible is fast becoming a crime in a society where &#8220;it&#8217;s in the Charter studid&#8221; applies more clearly to regious freedom than to the reference to sex.  The originator of the Charter intended to protect people from being denied employment or access to education and other benefits simply on the basis of sex (male or female) not sexual orientation!  If the interpretation is to be enlarged to include sexual orientation &#8230; than why are we discriminating against bi-sexual people?  Shouldn&#8217;t they be allowed to marry one of each kind, male and female? Let&#8217;s go all the way people!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIVITATENSIS &#187; Bishop Henry of Calgary</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>CIVITATENSIS &#187; Bishop Henry of Calgary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 03:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>[...] 8221;  The remarks have been controversial and have landed the Bishop a human rights suit (here). Also, recently, Bishop Henry repeated and defended hi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8221;  The remarks have been controversial and have landed the Bishop a human rights suit (here). Also, recently, Bishop Henry repeated and defended hi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic -  &#187; Bishop Henry&#8217;s New Statement on Homosexuality:  Clarification or Capitulation?</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic -  &#187; Bishop Henry&#8217;s New Statement on Homosexuality:  Clarification or Capitulation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 15:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>[...] /thepolitic" rel="tag"&#62; 			Roman Catholic Bishop Fred Henry of Calgary recently had a human rights complaint filed against him for comments he made on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] /thepolitic&#8221; rel=&#8221;tag&#8221;&gt;<br />
 			Roman Catholic Bishop Fred Henry of Calgary recently had a human rights complaint filed against him for comments he made on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic -  &#187; It&#8217;s Not Just About Acceptance</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic -  &#187; It&#8217;s Not Just About Acceptance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/30/homosexuality-newspeak-and-censorship/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] pecially close relationship with one of his disciples.  	You can listen to his talk here. 	We&#8217;ve noted how here in Canada how same-sex marriage is no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pecially close relationship with one of his disciples.  	You can listen to his talk here. 	We&#8217;ve noted how here in Canada how same-sex marriage is no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
