<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Political Blogs in Deep Trouble?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/</link>
	<description>Conservative group weblog that publishes daily commentary on political events and topics affecting Canada, the United States and the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: populist.html</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-159735</link>
		<dc:creator>populist.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-159735</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] BLOG: THE POLITIC [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] BLOG: THE POLITIC [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIVITATENSIS &#187; Blogging From the Periphery</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>CIVITATENSIS &#187; Blogging From the Periphery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 02:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>[...] t bastions of free speech. But that may not last much longer. Tom Cerber at thePolitic saw this coming last March in the context of Ameri [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] t bastions of free speech. But that may not last much longer. Tom Cerber at thePolitic saw this coming last March in the context of Ameri [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIVITATENSIS &#187; To bloggingly go&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>CIVITATENSIS &#187; To bloggingly go&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] technology ,  culture&#160;  	Some are concerned by the possibility that bloggers may be silenced during future US elections.  Today, t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology ,  culture&nbsp;</p>
<p> 	Some are concerned by the possibility that bloggers may be silenced during future US elections.  Today, t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Harries</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Harries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>In this discussion one ought constantly remind one&#039;s self that &quot;THE GOVERNMENT&quot; is a puppet and it is misleading to attribute its own power to it.  Rather, notice who the Puppet Masters are.  They are the ones for whom THE GOVERNMENT is their instrument for grasping power, and they ought be the targets who to receive praise or blame. The right wing is increasingly determined to shut down free speech. To see an in-depth development of this theme, visit the three part Introductory Dialogue at:  http://www.ot-mp.net
We stand on the brink of a right wing, religion energized, fascistic corporocracy.  The liberals apparently aren&#039;t aware that Jesus was a potent liberal.  See the evidence at: http://www.ot-mp.net/notes.html#DIGRESSION%20OM%20JESUS%20AS%20A%20LIBERA L
It is not possible to translate any of Jesus&#039; sermons, parables, and demonstrations into works (James 2: 18-26) without them being found solidly on the liberal side of the political ledger. SLEEPERS AWAKE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this discussion one ought constantly remind one&#8217;s self that &#8220;THE GOVERNMENT&#8221; is a puppet and it is misleading to attribute its own power to it.  Rather, notice who the Puppet Masters are.  They are the ones for whom THE GOVERNMENT is their instrument for grasping power, and they ought be the targets who to receive praise or blame. The right wing is increasingly determined to shut down free speech. To see an in-depth development of this theme, visit the three part Introductory Dialogue at:  <a href="http://www.ot-mp.net" >http://www.ot-mp.net</a><br />
We stand on the brink of a right wing, religion energized, fascistic corporocracy.  The liberals apparently aren&#8217;t aware that Jesus was a potent liberal.  See the evidence at: <a href="http://www.ot-mp.net/notes.html#DIGRESSION%20OM%20JESUS%20AS%20A%20LIBERA" >http://www.ot-mp.net/notes.htm.....A%20LIBERA</a> L<br />
It is not possible to translate any of Jesus&#8217; sermons, parables, and demonstrations into works (James 2: 18-26) without them being found solidly on the liberal side of the political ledger. SLEEPERS AWAKE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolitic -  &#187; To Bloggingly go&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolitic -  &#187; To Bloggingly go&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 06:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] l @ March 6, 2005  	 	 	 			Some are concerned by the possibility that bloggers may be silenced during future US elections.  Today, t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] l @ March 6, 2005 </p>
<p> 			Some are concerned by the possibility that bloggers may be silenced during future US elections.  Today, t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Cerber</title>
		<link>http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cerber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2005/03/04/are-politicsl-blogs-in-deep-trouble/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Senator John McCain of McCain-Feingold campaign financing law fame who would support the FEC on this one.  Why do you think blogs would find protection under First Amendment?  It seems their after politically motivated blogs whose postings consist of partisan boosterism.  If they share links to campaigns, and if they&#039;re not registered with any one party, they just might fall under McCain-Feingold.  Moreover, if they accept advertising money, like the ones I see above, corporations would have their lawyers over banning blogs asap.

If things might go grimly in the US, think of what could happen in Canada where by law only parties are allowed to engage in campaigns.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Senator John McCain of McCain-Feingold campaign financing law fame who would support the FEC on this one.  Why do you think blogs would find protection under First Amendment?  It seems their after politically motivated blogs whose postings consist of partisan boosterism.  If they share links to campaigns, and if they&#8217;re not registered with any one party, they just might fall under McCain-Feingold.  Moreover, if they accept advertising money, like the ones I see above, corporations would have their lawyers over banning blogs asap.</p>
<p>If things might go grimly in the US, think of what could happen in Canada where by law only parties are allowed to engage in campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

